Un largo camino
Washington Examiner:
In 2008, Obama won 53 percent of the vote, the highest percentage for any Democratic nominee in history except Andrew Jackson, Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson. Now he's averaging 46 percent in recent polls.
That's much closer to the 45 percent that Democratic candidates won in elections to the House in 2010. And in the last three presidential elections, the winning candidate has won the same percentage (or within 1 percent) as his party's percentage in House elections two years before.
Obama had a popular vote margin of 7 percent in 2008. But Republicans had a margin of 7 percent in the popular vote for the House in 2010. If you tote up the electoral votes in the states they carried, you would find them with a 351-184 edge over Democrats (the remaining three in the District of Columbia are obviously Democratic).
When you look at target states, you see the same picture. Take Gallup's 12 swing states, which in its most recent survey together favored Obama over Romney by 47 to 45 percent. That's a lot less than the 53 to 45 percent by which he carried them four years ago.
In recent state-by-state polling, Obama leads in all 12 but averages more than 50 percent only in New Mexico and Wisconsin. And in all 12 he's polling less than the percentage he won in 2008.
There are big drop-offs in Pennsylvania and New Hampshire, where Obama owed his victory to big margins among affluent suburbanites -- Mitt Romney's strongest demographic in the primaries.
His smallest drop-off is in North Carolina, which he carried only 50 to 49 percent but where voters seem sharply polarized. It's a particular target for Obama, who chose Charlotte as the site of the Democratic National Convention.
Romney is running even in recent Florida polls and less than 5 points behind in Iowa, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio and Virginia -- within striking distance. If he wins them all plus safe Republican states, he'll be elected.
That's without Colorado, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, with 66 electoral votes in all, which could conceivably be within Romney's reach.
Democrats hope to expand the field to Arizona, with 11 electoral votes, and Republicans hope to expand it to New Jersey, with 14. Those hopes may look dim now, but at this point in 2008 few expected Obama to carry North Carolina or Indiana.
The bottom line is that at this point Obama doesn't have an Electoral College lock. Neither does Romney. The numbers tell us that this election is up for grabs.
The Obama campaign has prepared for a long, hard slog through the target states. The Romney campaign is getting prepared for the same.
4 comentarios:
Si mal no recuerdo, alguna vez has comentado que es difícil que un candidato remonte cuando a pocos meses de las elecciones lleva unos cuantos puntos de desventaja. No sé si es exactamente así o si el 3-5% de las encuestas de hoy mismo entran ahí, pero en todo caso me parece que lo que suceda en los próximos meses va a tener importancia para decidir el nombre del futuro presidente, aunque claro está lo más importante sea la coyuntura económica en el momento de las elecciones.
Normalmente las encuestas varían poco a partir de la segunda semana de septiembre, más o menos. Pero antes varían muchísimo. Hemos visto candidatos con 17 puntos de ventaja en verano que perdieron en noviembre.
Aunque me parece que esta elección será de pocas variaicones. Unas veces estará unoa rriba, otras veces otro, pero manteniendo la igualdad, y rara vez superando en mucho el 50%.
Antxon, un lujazo volver a leerte, ya lo sabes. Espero que vaya todo mejor.¿ Qué te parece lo de Obama y el matrimonio gay? ¿bueno o malo para él? Yo nunca le votaría pero se lo reconozco, olé xd.
César G.
Nada va mejor. He vuelto a actualizar pero puede que tenga que volver a parar.
Publicar un comentario