martes, 8 de marzo de 2011

La aprobación de las élites y las bases

En su último artículo, Jonathan Chait (The New Republic) explica por qué ve a Pawlenty favorito para hacerse con la nominación republicana.

(...) With few declared candidates and no clear frontrunner, the Republican presidential primary appears to be as muddled as ever. But I actually think things are shaking out in a way as to clear the path for Tim Pawlenty.

My view of the primary selection system is that it consists of two basic constituencies, the elites and the base. The elites want to find a candidate who is electable and committed to their policy agenda. The elites are the prime driver of the process; they can communicate, via organs like Fox News and The Weekly Standard, which candidates may be undeserving of serious consideration despite their emotional appeal to base voters. That’s how the elites have disqualified insurgent candidates like Pat Buchanan (too right-wing) and John McCain (too left-wing); they are now doing the same to Sarah Palin (too unelectable).

But elites don’t always control the process. Sometimes they can get together and virtually determine the winner in advance (i.e., George W. Bush in 1999-2000), but, often, they can’t pick candidates without the assent of the base, which is capable of winnowing out elite-approved candidates. Think John Connally, Phil Gramm, or others for examples of candidates who made it through the elite primary but were nixed by the voters.

So, if you want to find the next Republican nominee, you need to find a candidate who’s acceptable to both elites and the base. A good summation of the list of elite-approve candidate’s can be found in George Will’s column from last Sunday. Ruthlessly purging every candidate of potential candidate lacking electoral plausibility, Will lists five possibilities. Other candidates—Palin, Mike Huckabee, Newt Gingrich, or others—may have some appeal to the base, but Republican elites will probably be able to dissuade voters from considering them on electability grounds. Will’s five: Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels, Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour, former Utah governor and departing ambassador to China Jon Huntsman, former Massachusetts Governor Romney, and Pawlenty.

Continúa (...)

1 comentario:

Anónimo dijo...

Fue Antxon el primero que lo pronosticó en este blog y es que Pawlenty está haciendo realmente bien las cosas. Yo he venido apostando por Romney y por Thune pero he de reconocer que es Pawlenty quien menos errores está cometiendo y viendo los problemas que está teniendo Romney con el denominado RomneyCere, sistema de salud que puso en marcha cuando fue gobernador de Massachusetts, no me extrañaría que el candidato de consenso fuera Pawlenty.

Reconozco que se poco sobre Pawlenty.

Un abrazo para todos

Casto Martín