viernes, 18 de febrero de 2011

T-Paw en la portada de National Review

El número contiene un artículo de Ramesh Ponnuru, sólo disponible para suscriptores. Esta es una pequeña introducción:

(...) As Pawlenty prepares to run for the Republican nomination for president, his main problem is simple: Most Americans have never heard of him. Republicans tend to prefer known commodities: Every winner of the Republican nomination in the last 70 years had a national reputation a year before the primaries. The Courage to Stand is not selling well. Yet Pawlenty may just be the Republicans’ strongest presidential candidate for 2012. Compared with his competitors, he is either more conservative, more electable, or both…

Larry Jacobs, who studies politics at the University of Minnesota’s Humphrey School, comments, “In Minnesota, Pawlenty was always seen as the state’s most charismatic and politically talented politician. Here’s a guy who was a conservative fending off often large Democratic majorities and [he] consistently had over 50 percent approval and dominated public debate. He had a remarkable knack for appealing to people on non-political grounds. . . . Mostly it was the way he talked about public policy and politics. People who fundamentally disagreed with him on public policy found him appealing.” (...)

1 comentario:

Anónimo dijo...

Ahora mismo se necesita un Señor al mando que sepa lo que es la economía, que sepa lo que es un pequeño negocio, que sepa lo que es el trabajo y lo que cuesta ganar, que sepa que hay que superarse para alcanzar el éxito, en definitiva que sepa lo que es gobernar y ese Señor, digan lo que digan, se llama Mitt Romney. Es el candidato más viable y simplemente es el tipo mejor preparado para acceder a la Presidencia.

Luis